top of page

Czech Supreme Court Confirms Cost Plus Method in Intra-Group Services Case

July 2024


The Czech Supreme Administrative Court ruled on a transfer pricing dispute between BEAS SUN s.r.o. and the tax authorities regarding the appropriate method to determine the arm’s length price for intra-group low value-added services. The authorities had applied the Cost Plus method, using the parent company's wage base with a 7% mark-up, in line with Guideline D-10.


BEAS SUN argued that the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method should have been used instead. However, both the Regional Court and the Supreme Court found that the CUP method requires high comparability and is only preferred when comparable independent transactions exist—none of which were identified in this case. The Cost Plus method was deemed appropriate due to the nature of the services and lack of comparables.


The Court upheld the authorities’ application of Guideline D-10 and OECD principles, concluding that the taxpayer failed to demonstrate why the chosen method was inappropriate or provide better comparables.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
𝐆𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐔𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐬 𝐎𝐄𝐂𝐃-𝐁𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞

27 May 2025 Germany’s Constitutional Court examined whether Section 1 of the Foreign Tax Act was constitutionally applied in a dispute involving Timber GmbH & Co. KG. The taxpayer challenged profit ad

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page