top of page

๐†๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐”๐ฉ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐Ž๐„๐‚๐ƒ-๐๐š๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐Œ๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐“๐ข๐ฆ๐›๐ž๐ซ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐‚๐š๐ฌ๐ž

27 May 2025


Germanyโ€™s Constitutional Court examined whether Section 1 of the Foreign Tax Act was constitutionally applied in a dispute involving Timber GmbH & Co. KG. The taxpayer challenged profit adjustments made by the tax authority, arguing that the use of OECD-aligned methods exceeded administrative discretion.ย 


The Court disagreed, holding that the comparable profits and resale price methods were appropriate tools for assessing the armโ€™s length nature of the companyโ€™s cross-border related-party transactions.


By endorsing the tax authorityโ€™s reliance on OECD methodologies, the Court reaffirmed Germanyโ€™s alignment of domestic transfer pricing rules with international standards.

The decision strengthens legal certainty around Germanyโ€™s use of established OECD methods and confirms that courts will uphold transfer pricing adjustments when taxpayers cannot demonstrate that internal prices reflect market conditions.

ย 
ย 
ย 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page