๐๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐ฉ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐-๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐
- GTC Global
- 3 days ago
- 1 min read
27 May 2025
Germanyโs Constitutional Court examined whether Section 1 of the Foreign Tax Act was constitutionally applied in a dispute involving Timber GmbH & Co. KG. The taxpayer challenged profit adjustments made by the tax authority, arguing that the use of OECD-aligned methods exceeded administrative discretion.ย
The Court disagreed, holding that the comparable profits and resale price methods were appropriate tools for assessing the armโs length nature of the companyโs cross-border related-party transactions.
By endorsing the tax authorityโs reliance on OECD methodologies, the Court reaffirmed Germanyโs alignment of domestic transfer pricing rules with international standards.
The decision strengthens legal certainty around Germanyโs use of established OECD methods and confirms that courts will uphold transfer pricing adjustments when taxpayers cannot demonstrate that internal prices reflect market conditions.
Read the Full English Translation Here: Germany vs "Timber GmbH & Co. KG", May 2025, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Case No 2 BvR 172/24 - TPcases

Comments