top of page

Singapore High Court Upholds IRAS Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Intervac Asia Case

21 September 2020


Singapore’s High Court considered whether Intervac Asia Pte Ltd had correctly priced related-party distribution transactions, following transfer pricing adjustments made by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). IRAS found that Intervac’s resale margins fell below arm’s length benchmarks and applied the resale price method to increase taxable income.

The taxpayer argued that adverse market conditions justified its lower margins.


The Court upheld IRAS’s use of the resale price method, rejecting Intervac’s contention that market factors alone explained the margin shortfall. It found that the taxpayer had failed to demonstrate that its pricing outcomes were consistent with what independent parties would have agreed under comparable circumstances.


The Court emphasised that taxpayers bear the burden of proving that their transfer pricing reflects open-market conditions and that reliable comparables and documentation are essential. It endorsed IRAS’s pragmatic approach to comparability and its preference for traditional transaction methods where appropriate.


The decision reinforces Singapore’s strict approach to transfer pricing compliance, highlighting the importance of robust documentation and alignment between pricing outcomes and value creation in Singapore-based operations.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
𝐆𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐔𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐬 𝐎𝐄𝐂𝐃-𝐁𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞

27 May 2025 Germany’s Constitutional Court examined whether Section 1 of the Foreign Tax Act was constitutionally applied in a dispute involving Timber GmbH & Co. KG. The taxpayer challenged profit ad

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page